~~•~~•~~•~~•~~•~~•~~•~~    BOOKBUG CLUB     ~~•~~•~~•~~•~~•~~•~~•~~

january's book is:
NOT TO DISTURB \\ Muriel Spark

review updates:

Soooooooo essentially the whole reason i made this website was because i wanted to join bookbug. A couple months ago, i stumbled upon it by chance and realized that it was the first book club i've ever come across that actually matched my taste in reading, so yeah.

Every month a vote decides what book we read, review, and discuss. Being in a book club is perfect if you want to expand your taste and discover new stories. You might find your next favourite author at bookbug! Won't hurt to check out the button at the top^^



  • NOT TO DISTURB •

  MURIEL SPARK


  Year published \\ 1971

  Read \\ Jan.11.2026

  Bookbug month / entry # \\ Jan.2026 / entry #4





THOUGHTS!! ^•^

First bookbug book in 2026! Glad this one was short because January is the busiest and least-favourite month for me. Was considering skipping this one but good thing I didn't.

Overall, I can definitely say I enjoyed this read. I got use to the all the characters and found their conversations pretty entertaining. I don't think I ever read a book with that much dialogue and while I was reading I kept imagining the scenes in the format of a play, with one camera angle and a stage. The servants' personalities were well-written and I wouldn't have minded getting to know them more but I'm glad this book didn't bloat itself. Some premises are meant to stay novellas and I hate it when authors feel the need to stretch it out for 300 pages.

I don't know why but I really love the types of stories that withold important information from the readers and leaves us guessing what could possibly be going on and what their motive could be. This book feels like I'm intruding on a conversation I'm unwelcome to witness, even as a reader. And towards the end, we STILL don't have a clear answer on what their scheme is but it doesn't bother me that much.

Clearly, the servants are trying to inherit the Klopstocks' money, and the Baron seems to be in on it (?) There is talk of some script, that it was planned, and the servants say they know what happens in the library: the Baron shoots his wife and her mistress (her mister? what's the word?) and then shoots himself. So the Baron must have known beforehand. Did the Baron know that the servants knew? The servants talk about how it was all Lister's clever plan or something. Maybe Lister read some sort of suicide note, the "script", and then planned how to aqquire the inheritance and avoid suspiscion from the police. If the Baron and the servants disucssed it together: why? Anyway I'm writing this review while feeling a little nauseous so I don't feel like writing anymore. I have too many questions with this book and it's making my head hurt.

Fun little novella, I liked it.

  • THE HEART OF A DOG •

  MIKHAIL BULGAKOV


  Year published \\ 1925

  Original language \\ Russian

  Translator \\ George Szirtes

  Read \\ Dec.12.2025

  Bookbug month / entry # \\ Dec.2025 / entry #3

THOUGHTS!! ^•^

Writing this review three weeks after I read the book so I forgot some of the things I wanted to say... I should have written this immediately. School and winter are taking a huge toll on my sanity, spring is taking too long to come rescue me!!!!

To put it briefly, I really enjoyed this book. It's hilarious. And shorter than I thought it would be. I read this on an e-reader and unfortunately downloaded a version with the damn worst formatting I've ever seen. I had to mentally fill in some missing letters every now and then, which sucked, but my bumcheeks library never has any of the books I want so what was I to do? Anyway,

My mom recommended this book to me after we watched and discussed the recent, disappointing movie adaptation of Frankenstein. She told me that I would love A Dog's Heart (or The Heart of a Dog?) and that its movie adaptation had the perfect actor playing the dog. Didn't watch the movie in full but I can confirm she was right about that.

About the actual book.. I love Bulgakov's humour and I love reading about absurd situations. I read and loved The Master and Margarita and was pleased to see his style again. I was very interested in The Heart of a Dog's premise -- a dog accidently being turned into a human being, (at least, resembling one), while still retaining his animalstic urges, behaviours, and habits. Everything that happened after was very amusing to read about.

Now, this whole thing is obviously a commentary on the society and politics of Bulgakov's time -- specifically, communism and the soviet regime. I won't go into detail about the symbolism and about what each character/situation is supposed to respresent in the real world. I don't know enough about that era of eastern Europe to qualify telling you about all this book's implications, but I've had lots of fun on YouTube watching videos about everyone's takes on the story and learning more about the author's life. What I love about this book is all the different interpretations people can make on The Heart of a Dog.

I'm gonna end the review here. I definitely enjoyed this novella and it only reassured my opinion of Bulgakov's works. He's a controversial person, (saying this as someone whose parents are Ukranian immigrants regarding his anti-Ukranian sentiments, despite him having grown up in Kiev,) but a very good writer. I may read another novel of his in the far future. Happy New Years, by the way :)

  • THE MELANCHOLY OF RESISTANCE •

  LÁSZLÓ KRASZNAHORKAI


  Year published \\ 1989

  Original language \\ hungarian

  Translator \\ George Szirtes

  Read \\ nov.19.2025

  Bookbug month / entry # \\ Nov.2025 / entry #3

THOUGHTS!! ^•^

Wow. What a book. I don't even know where to begin, there's so much to unpack. Should I go chronlogically? Should I first talk about what striked tme the most? First of all, a month ago I had no clue the book, nor this author existed at all. I didn't even vote for this book in the club's poll so TMoR basically just fell into my laps. Thank god for that.

My first impression of this book, after I read the first chapter, was that it was super atmospheric. It felt like exactly it was late november -- frosty windows, gloomy skies, leafless trees, snowless ground.. The first scene in the train was very uncomfortable, and I think that that moment with the man slapping the old lady was a perfect introdution to the cruel, lawless world the story takes place in. I felt immense relief when Mrs. Plauf returned to her flat and the author rewarded me with cozy descriptions of her home. It felt so nostalgic -- reminded me of my slavic grandmother's appartment. I was hoping the story would revolve around her because I was so far really fond of her character.

With this book I discovered that I really enjoy apocalyptic books. It reminds me of Cormac McCarthy's The Road becaue of its desolate feel. But what I like about TMoR is that the apocalypse revolves around human-made destruction, societal collapse. There is no supernatural force driving the village to ruin, it's only themselves. To me that is scarier than some sort of hell opening up to swallow the earth.

I felt that throughout the book there was a recurring theme of meaninglessness(?) in life. I think that maybe that's what angered the people and what drove the mob into chaos. My brain's a little bit foggy and I'm having trouble piecing things together but something about the act of destruction was enchanting good people and somehow comforting them about their insignificance. I don't know, I will definitely give this book a reread because there are so many things I know I missed, so many connections I didn't make. Even with my half-understanding of the book I feel that it's very clever and will take another sit-through to fully comprehend. I didn't understand what it was exactly that drove my beloved Valuska to get swept with the mob. Maybe he thought that his love for the cosmos was actually silly and naive and that to embrace the chaos of the universe was what he was meant to do as he himself is a product of that chaos. Maybe it brought him reassurance about his meaningless existence and he succumbed to the force of entropy.

I think now's a good transition into what I think is the "melancholy of resistance". Because I don't think that Valuska's idea of space is silly. I thought it was super sweet, that here we have this man living an arguably miserable life in a horrendous village, but despite his enviroment he refused to live a life of misery, and instead he spends his time with his friend and being enamoured by the beauty of celestial systems. Naive, sure, but a necessary kind of naive -- a survival strategy. A resistance against the uncaring world around him. Same with Mr. Eszter -- I believe he went into retirement after find out that music was based on faulty calculations or something like that, and no one cared but him. looking at music as an objectively faulty system ruined the art for him. But at the end of the book he is heard playing on the piano. I think he realized that dwelling on music's failures brought no use. He simply played for the sake of its beauty.

At some point you must give up trying to make sense of the world and live for the sake of living. Resist against the chaos, even though there is ultimately no point.

? I think that's the message i got from TMoR. I don't know. There is so much more I want to say about the book but i think I'll leave it as is. Overall, stunning book. I can confirm that it's my favourite.

  THE COLLECTOR

  JOHN FOWLES


  Year published \\ 1963

  Read \\ oct.2-oct.9 2025

  Bookbug month / entry # \\ Oct.2025 / entry #2





THOUGHTS!! ^•^

I devoured this book. It was really entertaining and the story succesfully hooked me. Especially because I have been reading a lot of plotless/vibe-based books lately -- the last two books I read were Lispector's so it was a nice refresher to read something with more structure.

My favourite section was Miranda's diary. I did not expect that we'd get to see her perspective but I'm really glad we did. Even though it repeats the same events we already read about through Fredrick's POV, I found it very interesting to find out how M saw things and how the two characters percieved the same situation. Also, the transition between the two POVs was quite startling. What I mean is that for about a hundred pages we're in the mind of this "totally chill guy" who wrote his thoughts with proper structure and novel-like format, (yes yes i know that's because it's a novel) and nothing was "off" about his writing. It was like F was convincing us that we shouldn't take the situation seriously. That it's all normal. And then all of a sudden the mood switches and M writes with short, incomplete sentences and repeats many phrases. It really striked me. The poor girl was really, really, truly suffering in there. I don't know how to explain it but there the book took on a more frightening, desperate note. Kudos to John Fowles for effectivley giving me a shock and for giving M a voice.

My only complaint is that I was a little bit disappointed with the ending. While reading the book I was always thinking Is F going to set her free? Is he going to kill her? Is there any redemption in him at all? and How will M fight back? Will she see her family again? Will she accept the situation? However none of those things happened. M just got an illness and died. The author completely avoided writing the conclusions to his characters' development. I felt like something should have happened. M didn't deserve that end and F didn't deserve for the situation to resolve itself. I guess in a way he did actually kill her. Maybe I'm being being a little biased -- maybe that was the author's point. Bad things happen to good people. Good things happen to bad people. Fate can make its own decisions. I dunno. I'm curious to hear other bugs' opinions on this.

Last point I want to make is that I realized that many authors make the connection between collecting butterflies and psycopathic behaviour. And by "many authors" I mean Vladimir Nabokov, my beloved. He was obsessed with that theme and it was evident in the two books of his that I read, Lolita and Pale Fire. I guess Fowles saw the symbolism in it as well.

I didn't collect any quotes because oops. Anyway, this was overall a great read and I'm glad I read it. Didn't even know this book existed until the club's october poll.

  AGUA VIVA

  CLARICE LISPECTOR


  Year published \\ 1973

  Original language \\ Portugese

  Translator \\ Stefan Tobler

  Read \\ approx. july.2025

  Bookbug month / entry # \\ Sep.2025 / entry #1

THOUGHTS!! ^•^

I knew this book would become my favourite before I even finished it. It's so enchanting and hypnotic, my only regret is that I didn't spread the reading out so that it could last longer. I first approached this book with a pen as my bookmark so that I could make notes on it and try to "figure out" what was going on. That was a mistake. It was exhausting and an impossible task because there was nothing to figure out, there was just there. So about ten pages in I read

" What I tell you should be read quickly like when you look. "

and I realized that she was right. It felt like Clarice was trying to imitate the speed of thought and I was betraying her mission by lingering, so I put the pen down. And it is better to read this book that way, in my opinion, and I had more fun. Here's my favourite quote:

" I may not have meaning but it is the same lack of meaning that the pulsing vein has. "

**When i read a book that happens to be a club's pick in the past, (before i joined the club,) said book's review will be added below. Entry #s will be in the negatives.**


  THE APPLE IN THE DARK

  CLARICE LISPECTOR


  Year published: -- 1961

  Original language: -- Portugese

  Translator: -- Benjamin Moser

  Time read: -- sep.8-oct.5 2025 [dnf]

  Bookbug month / entry #: March.2025 / entry #-2


THOUGHTS!! ^•^

Hmm... strange book... Although I DNF this one I will admit that I actually did like it for some reason. It's very slow and it was nice to read after coming home from a long shift. I read 3/4 of it before I said to myself that I should leave it. I wanted to finish it, though. I stopped after Martim and Vitoria's conversation by the tree that was meant to be chopped down.

It seemed like the majority of members really did not like this one. I understand why. It's mostly based on writing about nonsense, (or at least, what feels like nonsense to readers,) and the plot is paper-thin. The premise is interesting, in my opinion--guy on the run after a crime but we never find out what the crime is. Under a different author I feel like this book could've been widely beloved.

I liked the moment on p.44 where Martim realizes he accidently killed the bird. I like subtle symbolic moments like that. I was hoping that was the route the story would take. On another note, I thought Ermelinda's character was interesting. She said something I understood, something I felt at some point in my life:

--Look at this fern! she said to the man because a person can't say "I love you."

It's hard to extract phrases from Lispector because everything she writes comes from what she wrote before(?) so this quote on its own sounds incomplete. But anyway, I related to this. I say to my best friend, "The sunset is beautiful," and when I say this, what I'm really saying is that she means a lot to me.

But my favourite quote comes from Martim who bursts,

--We don't know where we come from and we don't know where we're going, but we experience, we experience! and that's what we've got, Ermelinda, that's what we've got!

I wholeheartedly agree. Dare I say it's my life philosophy. Anyway... overall I kinda like this book but my impatience overcame me.

  100 YEARS OF SOLITUDE

  GABRIEL GARCIA MARQUEZ


  Date published: -- 1967

  Original language: -- Spanish

  Translator: -- Gregory Rabassa

  Time read: -- approx. aug.2025

  Bookbug month / entry #: Sep.2024 / entry #-1

THOUGHTS!! ^•^

I actually really liked this book. It reminds me a lot of Wuthering Heights because both of their plots are centered around a certain bloodline and house(s). My favourite part of the book was the section about the war, I think my fav character might've been Colonel Aureliano. I thought his character was interesting because I love to read about a good descent into madness and a slow corruption. It was sad to see how he let that friend of his get killed, and I like this quote said by Aureliano's other close friend.

" "Watch out for your heart, Aureliano," Colonel Gerineldo Marquez would say to him then. "You're rotting alive." "

I was happy to see Colonel Aureliano finally get back to himself and decide not to kill his best friend. I also really loved how the author writes about the characters' deaths -- they're all so strange and bittersweet, especially Arcadio's and Amaranta's.

" In the shattered schoolhouse where for the first time he had felt the security of power, a few feet from the room where he had come to know the uncertainty of love, Arcadio found the formality of death ridiculous. Death really did not matter to him but life did, and therefore the sensation he felt when they gave their decision was not a feeling of fear but of nostalgia. "

In general I really liked the "crazy" situations that the author sprinkles in every once in a while. I wish we got more of that Jose Arcadio Segundo (the one who survived the massacre at the station.) Those few pages were disturbing -- J.A.S waking up next to thousands of corpses, having to crawl his way back covered in blood, and no one believing him. (By the way, what's with all this memory loss in the book and how characters don't believe any events that happened not even remotely in the past? It really reminds me of Nineteen Eighty-Four and the idea that the past doesn't exist and it can be manipulated as easily as people's minds can be manipulated.) The paralels/references are also something I really liked and that Ursula's right, that it really does feel like time goes in circles and eventually repeats itself.

" When he recognized his great-grandmother's voice he turned his head toward the door, tried to smile, and without knowing it repeated an old phrase of Ursula's.
     "What did you expect?" he murmured. "Time passes."
     "That's how it goes," Ursula said, "but not so much."
      When she said it she realized that she was giving the same reply that Colonel Aureliano Buendia had given in his death cell, and once more she shuddered with the evidence that time was not passing, as she had just admitted, but that it was turning in a circle. "

Overall I really liked the book, even though it was hard to get through all that pedophillia and incest. In a small way I see this book as a warning not to repeat the past's mistakes (don't have kids with your damn cousins!) as it, and everyone's ignorance towards the past (and towards themselves and others), eventually contributed to the downfall of Macondo and/or the Buendia bloodline.

" [...] everything written on them was unrepeatable since time immemorial and forever more, because races condemned to one hundred years of solitude did not have a second oppurtunity on earth. "