~~•~~•~~•~~•~~•~~•~~•~~    BOOKBUG CLUB     ~~•~~•~~•~~•~~•~~•~~•~~

october's book is:
THE COLLECTOR -- John Fowles
status:

review posted below!

Soooooooo essentially the whole reason i made this website was because i wanted to join bookbug. A couple months ago, i stumbled upon it by chance and realized that it was the first book club i've ever come across that actually matched my taste in reading, so yeah.

Every month a vote decides what book we read, review, and discuss. Being in a book club is perfect if you want to expand your taste and discover new stories. You might find your next favourite author at bookbug! Won't hurt to check out the button at the top^^



  THE COLLECTOR

  JOHN FOWLES


  Year published: -- 1963

  Time read: -- oct.2-oct.9 2025

  Bookbug month / entry #: Oct.2025 / entry #2





THOUGHTS!! ^•^

I devoured this book. It was really entertaining and the story succesfully hooked me. Especially because I have been reading a lot of plotless/vibe-based books lately -- the last two books I read were Lispector's so it was a nice refresher to read something with more structure.

My favourite section was Miranda's diary. I did not expect that we'd get to see her perspective but I'm really glad we did. Even though it repeats the same events we already read about through Fredrick's POV, I found it very interesting to find out how M saw things and how the two characters percieved the same situation. Also, the transition between the two POVs was quite startling. What I mean is that for about a hundred pages we're in the mind of this "totally chill guy" who wrote his thoughts with proper structure and novel-like format, (yes yes i know that's because it's a novel) and nothing was "off" about his writing. It was like F was convincing us that we shouldn't take the situation seriously. That it's all normal. And then all of a sudden the mood switches and M writes with short, incomplete sentences and repeats many phrases. It really striked me. The poor girl was really, really, truly suffering in there. I don't know how to explain it but there the book took on a more frightening, desperate note. Kudos to John Fowles for effectivley giving me a shock and for giving M a voice.

My only complaint is that I was a little bit disappointed with the ending. While reading the book I was always thinking Is F going to set her free? Is he going to kill her? Is there any redemption in him at all? and How will M fight back? Will she see her family again? Will she accept the situation? However none of those things happened. M just got an illness and died. The author completely avoided writing the conclusions to his characters' development. I felt like something should have happened. M didn't deserve that end and F didn't deserve for the situation to resolve itself. I guess in a way he did actually kill her. Maybe I'm being being a little biased -- maybe that was the author's point. Bad things happen to good people. Good things happen to bad people. Fate can make its own decisions. I dunno. I'm curious to hear other bugs' opinions on this.

Last point I want to make is that I realized that many authors make the connection between collecting butterflies and psycopathic behaviour. And by "many authors" I mean Vladimir Nabokov, my beloved. He was obsessed with that theme and it was evident in the two books of his that I read, Lolita and Pale Fire. I guess Fowles saw the symbolism in it as well.

I didn't collect any quotes because oops. Anyway, this was overall an great read and I'm glad I read it. Didn't even know this book existed until the club's october poll.

  AGUA VIVA

  CLARICE LISPECTOR


  Year published: -- 1973

  Original language: -- Portugese

  Translator: -- Stefan Tobler

  Time read: -- approx. july.2025

  Bookbug month / entry #: Sep.2025 / entry #1

THOUGHTS!! ^•^

I knew this book would become my favourite before I even finished it. It's so enchanting and hypnotic, my only regret is that I didn't spread the reading out so that it could last longer. I first approached this book with a pen as my bookmark so that I could make notes on it and try to "figure out" what was going on. That was a mistake. It was exhausting and an impossible task because there was nothing to figure out, there was just there. So about ten pages in I read

" What I tell you should be read quickly like when you look. "

and I realized that she was right. It felt like Clarice was trying to imitate the speed of thought and I was betraying her mission by lingering, so I put the pen down. And it is better to read this book that way, in my opinion, and I had more fun. Here's my favourite quote:

" I may not have meaning but it is the same lack of meaning that the pulsing vein has. "

**When i read a book that happens to be a club's pick in the past, (before i joined the club,) said book's review will be added below. Entry #s will be in the negatives.**


  THE APPLE IN THE DARK

  CLARICE LISPECTOR


  Year published: -- 1961

  Original language: -- Portugese

  Translator: -- Benjamin Moser

  Time read: -- sep.8-oct.5 2025 [dnf]

  Bookbug month / entry #: March.2025 / entry #-2


THOUGHTS!! ^•^

Hmm... strange book... Although I DNF this one I will admit that I actually did like it for some reason. It's very slow and it was nice to read after coming home from a long shift. I read 3/4 of it before I said to myself that I should leave it. I wanted to finish it, though. I stopped after Martim and Vitoria's conversation by the tree that was meant to be chopped down.

It seemed like the majority of members really did not like this one. I understand why. It's mostly based on writing about nonsense, (or at least, what feels like nonsense to readers,) and the plot is paper-thin. The premise is interesting, in my opinion--guy on the run after a crime but we never find out what the crime is. Under a different author I feel like this book could've been widely beloved.

I liked the moment on p.44 where Martim realizes he accidently killed the bird. I like subtle symbolic moments like that. I was hoping that was the route the story would take. On another note, I thought Ermelinda's character was interesting. She said something I understood, something I felt at some point in my life:

--Look at this fern! she said to the man because a person can't say "I love you."

It's hard to extract phrases from Lispector because everything she writes comes from what she wrote before(?) so this quote on its own sounds incomplete. But anyway, I related to this. I say to my best friend, "The sunset is beautiful," and when I say this, what I'm really saying is that she means a lot to me.

But my favourite quote comes from Martim who bursts,

--We don't know where we come from and we don't know where we're going, but we experience, we experience! and that's what we've got, Ermelinda, that's what we've got!

I wholeheartedly agree. Dare I say it's my life philosophy. Anyway... overall I kinda like this book but my impatience overcame me.

  100 YEARS OF SOLITUDE

  GABRIEL GARCIA MARQUEZ


  Date published: -- 1967

  Original language: -- Spanish

  Translator: -- Gregory Rabassa

  Time read: -- approx. aug.2025

  Bookbug month / entry #: Sep.2024 / entry #-1

THOUGHTS!! ^•^

I actually really liked this book. It reminds me a lot of Wuthering Heights because both of their plots are centered around a certain bloodline and house(s). My favourite part of the book was the section about the war, I think my fav character might've been Colonel Aureliano. I thought his character was interesting because I love to read about a good descent into madness and a slow corruption. It was sad to see how he let that friend of his get killed, and I like this quote said by Aureliano's other close friend.

" "Watch out for your heart, Aureliano," Colonel Gerineldo Marquez would say to him then. "You're rotting alive." "

I was happy to see Colonel Aureliano finally get back to himself and decide not to kill his best friend. I also really loved how the author writes about the characters' deaths -- they're all so strange and bittersweet, especially Arcadio's and Amaranta's.

" In the shattered schoolhouse where for the first time he had felt the security of power, a few feet from the room where he had come to know the uncertainty of love, Arcadio found the formality of death ridiculous. Death really did not matter to him but life did, and therefore the sensation he felt when they gave their decision was not a feeling of fear but of nostalgia. "

In general I really liked the "crazy" situations that the author sprinkles in every once in a while. I wish we got more of that Jose Arcadio Segundo (the one who survived the massacre at the station.) Those few pages were disturbing -- J.A.S waking up next to thousands of corpses, having to crawl his way back covered in blood, and no one believing him. (By the way, what's with all this memory loss in the book and how characters don't believe any events that happened not even remotely in the past? It really reminds me of Nineteen Eighty-Four and the idea that the past doesn't exist and it can be manipulated as easily as people's minds can be manipulated.) The paralels/references are also something I really liked and that Ursula's right, that it really does feel like time goes in circles and eventually repeats itself.

" When he recognized his great-grandmother's voice he turned his head toward the door, tried to smile, and without knowing it repeated an old phrase of Ursula's.
     "What did you expect?" he murmured. "Time passes."
     "That's how it goes," Ursula said, "but not so much."
      When she said it she realized that she was giving the same reply that Colonel Aureliano Buendia had given in his death cell, and once more she shuddered with the evidence that time was not passing, as she had just admitted, but that it was turning in a circle. "

Overall I really liked the book, even though it was hard to get through all that pedophillia and incest. In a small way I see this book as a warning not to repeat the past's mistakes (don't have kids with your damn cousins!) as it, and everyone's ignorance towards the past (and towards themselves and others), eventually contributed to the downfall of Macondo and/or the Buendia bloodline.

" [...] everything written on them was unrepeatable since time immemorial and forever more, because races condemned to one hundred years of solitude did not have a second oppurtunity on earth. "